ghost_in_the_shell
Director
Cast
, , , , , ,
Rated
R
Runtime
82 min.
Release Date
11/18/1995
ghost_in_the_shell_poster

Cyberpunk and Japanese animation aficionados drool over Ghost in the Shell, the influential 1995 feature that, along with Akira in 1988 and the entire oeuvre of Hayao Miyazaki, marked the popularization of anime overseas. After anime’s proved popular outside of its country of origin, animators began catering to the other markets, and many fans feel that the purity of the Japanese artistry lessened—which is to say, became westernized—as a result. Ghost in the Shell was a major contributor to anime’s increasing popularity; its posters could be found on college dorm room walls alongside those for The Boondock Saints and Scarface. But like many other anime titles of its day, the film has not aged well, emphasizing the cultish, fad-level enthusiasm for anime in the 1990s. Nevertheless, its contribution to science-fiction remains more significant even than its status as an anime.

Based on the serialized 1989 manga by Masamune Shirow, Ghost in the Shell was directed by Mamoru Oshii, and it remains his most successful and popular film (next to his Patlabor series and the 2004 sequel, Ghost in the Shell: Innocence). Kazunori Ito, Oshii’s frequent collaborator, wrote the screenplay, though the director’s vision shaped the film. Oshii’s preoccupation with futureworlds and the infancy of the digital age led to an exploration of these themes. Looking back, Oshii reflected a very specific paradigm in which the understanding of computers and the internet was limited. Take the now-laughable title sequence that displays archaic, Windows 95-level computer animations that were rather rudimentary even in 1995. Such animations are more memorable for their use of neon green letters on a black digital plane (following the look of every computerized corporate interface from the preceding decade).

Set in 2029, the story takes place in the vast New Port City, which appears to be in the beginning stages of gentrification. Technology has been ungainly applied to buildings and human beings alike. It’s a world of cyborgs, as most people have robotic body parts, while others exist as a human consciousness inside of a “shell”—a robot body with special abilities (super strength, invisibility, etc.). The story follows public security officer Major Motoko Kusanagi, whose voluptuous body is a factory model and mostly always nude (shame and modesty do not apply when your body is not real). She and her partners, the sharpshooter Batou and regular guy Ishikawa, are tasked with capturing an American hacker-terrorist known as the Puppet Master. But as Maj. Kusanagi eventually learns, the Puppet Master achieved consciousness after being created by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a covert hacking weapon. After Maj. Kusanagi and the Puppet Master are both nearly destroyed in a climactic battle, they merge together as one, forming a new being comprised of multiple layers of technology and consciousness.

Ghost in the Shell is also a neo-noir mystery in the same way as Blade Runner, and both films contain a hero who achieves a sort of transcendent revelation in the finale. But Oshii’s film is perhaps overly concerned with its ideas about technology. Rather than developing characters through action and personality, the script’s wooden dialogue pours out in expositional form, rendering the technological themes inescapable. Maj. Kusanagi ruminates, “There are countless ingredients that make up the human body and mind, like all the components that make up me as an individual with my own personality. Sure, I have a face and voice to distinguish myself from others, but my thoughts and memories are unique only to me, and I carry a sense of my own destiny.” The film ponders whether humanity is reserved for human beings or even just a scanned ghost within a shell. Or can the synthesis of an artificial mind and body create its own soul?

Such questions linger in the external script, as opposed to the subtext where they belong, and don’t delve into characterization beyond the dense plot. Running 82 minutes, much of the film exists as a setup for grandiose revelations that have minor emotional resonance. They are mind-blowing for their story machinations and the questions they incite after viewing, but the discussion within the film itself is rudimentary. Consider the vague implications of Ghost in the Shell’s final line, “Time to become a part of all things.” The reference remains ambiguous in part because Oshii has not thoroughly explored the implications of his science-fiction world. Hints that people can “ghost hack” another mind and draw from its knowledge or memories are alluded to, but not adequately discussed, nor is the apparent network of connectivity that would allow the Maj. Kusanagi-Puppet Master hybrid to indeed become part of all things.

For every cumbersome hunk of dialogue or underexplored idea, there’s a gorgeously animated action set piece or beautiful, soft-filtered visual sequence. Much of the imagery and many of its themes have been borrowed from other material or replicated elsewhere. Its cityscape, which Oshii based on Hong Kong, contains buildings that reach as high as those in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis; though, they also recall those of Blade Runner, decrepit and falling apart, and what’s more drenched in an omnipresent rain. A beautiful montage sequence looks around the city to a hypnotic choral score, a wedding song no less, while a procession of boats on the flooded canal streets evokes melancholy. The sequence shows us a world that combines old and new spliced together into an ungainly whole, not unlike the protagonist. Meanwhile, the interface cords that input into the back of a shell’s neck were borrowed for The Matrix, and the Wachowskis also evoked Ghost in the Shell’s title sequence and computer animations in their now-iconic representation of the Matrix’s numbered rainfall.

Thematically, Maj. Kusanagi has been the center of a conversation about Ghost in the Shell’s portrayal of female strength and independence. Anime often depicts women as headstrong heroes, impressive fighters, and protectors of a noble morality—all while objectifying the female form with a fetishized representation of their bodies (Roger Ebert addressed this trend in the film in his review as well). It’s an unfortunate ideological conflict that’s evident throughout Ghost in the Shell, and even its poster. Similarly, Maj. Kusanagi could be seen as the future of female reproduction in a cyborg world. Though she has no sexual reproductive organs (she’s like Barbie down there), she merges with the Puppet Master to form a third, unique psyche in an ostensible procreation without coitus. Through this process, the parental units must sacrifice themselves for a child that contains all the data of its parents, yet also harbors a new consciousness. Unfortunately, any apparent theme of sexuality or reproduction remains projected by the viewer, since the screenplay avoids addressing gender in the cyborg world outside of the events of the thin plot.

To be sure, Ghost in the Shell is part of a long tradition of science-fiction films that consider the limits of humanity, technology, and the potential for consciousness within an artificial intelligence—all existing in a dystopian future. Though its female hero stands as a genre icon of strength and badassery, Maj. Kusanagi and her prominent nipples have nonetheless been animated to turn on the same audience she’s meant to inspire. With another half-hour and a script with more subtlety (and fewer exploitative artistic renderings of the female form), the film may have explored its themes with a greater sense of grace and emotion. Alas, Ghost in the Shell relies on a surface-level investigation of its ideas and images. Of course, fans of the cyberpunk and sci-fi genres must be thankful for its existence and unmistakable vision, while others should revisit the film to witness how it incited other directors to make better films.

  • Ty Nash

    I have always found people to be a bit too harsh when judging the amount of nudity featured in anime. For me, it has always been a theme inherent to the medium. Most all the classics, such as Ninja Scroll, Wicked City, Midori, Berserk, Perfect Blue, et cetera, feature quite a bit of exposed female bodies. In western animation, sexuality is often nonexistent and, as someone who is not squeamish about naked cartoons, I find the more erotic elements of anime to be a big draw. While I have never found the “objectification” argument to be very compelling, in the case of Ghost in the Shell it falls particularly flat. The Major, or at least her body, is quite literally an object. You even state quite early in the review; “shame and modesty do not apply when your body is not real.” Of course, this could be a clever excuse to shoehorn in a bit more nipple but I think you will be hard pressed to find an anime fan who’s going to complain about that. At the end of the day, I just don’t see how you can argue that Kusanagi’s badassery is negated by her nudity unless you are viewing the film through a very specific lens of social theory that really has nothing to do with the film itself.

    • Brian Eggert

      I don’t think the argument that anime fans wouldn’t complain about its female nudity, and therefore there’s nothing troubling about the trend, is a particularly strong one. Whether or not the character is real or robotic, the filmmakers/animators have chosen to sexualize the female form. She’s not allowed to be a completely heroic figure because part of her becomes an object for the male gaze. Balk if you will at the “social theory” behind that, but this speaks to a larger issue that goes beyond anime and into the Japanese culture’s sexism, representations and uses for women, and gender politics. These extratextual issues of social meaning matter; they’re a significant part of what discussing art is all about. After all, what is art if not a reflection of the culture that produces it? To only talk about what is onscreen is overlooking far too much of the film’s impact.

      I don’t begrudge anyone enjoying the film for the reasons you do. This is an exciting, cool film. But there’s much more than just an anime fan’s enthusiastic appreciation to consider here.

      • Ty Nash

        I certainly respect your position and see where you are coming from; however, concepts such as the “male gaze” hold little water unless, of course, you subscribe to the particular ideology that spawned them. (This is by no means a negative thing but personal ideology will inevitably color your opinion of art in a way that may not be understood by everyone.) Additionally, I think there is an argument for viewing foreign films and animation through the lens of cultural relativism. As I have stated previously, it is common to see nude heroines in anime and while this would seem out of place when compared to modern Marvel-flick fare, anime, as a genre, should probably be held to a different metric as it comes from a culture completely divorced from our own. You can say that this culture is in some ways less progressive but it is only so when viewed from a western perspective.

        Long story short, I think it would be a damn shame if Japanese artist were forced to capitulate to conventions of western social theory. (fortunately, I don’t believe they will.) The result would be the homogenization of an art form which speaks to so many because it is different.

        • Brian Eggert

          I get where you’re coming from and certainly understand your skepticism toward certain film theory. But I don’t think evidence of these theories is unique to western art. Part of the intention of these theories is to identify and question the nature of film and what it represents, regardless of the country of origin. If I simply accept what Oshii or anime as a whole are trying to do without questioning them, I am not being a very effective critic.

          I never argued Japanese culture is less progressive. I am merely attempting to note that women are often objectified in Japanese culture, and anime reflects this. Without going in to all the sexual politics of Japanese culture, I think the gaze has the same or a similar effect in Japan as it does in the West. It’s not a uniquely Western phenomenon, even if the theory originated in the West. The gaze is an act of power by men; it spans across history and countless cultures. If we simply accept that the gaze is there and ignore it, then we’re not asking questions or learning anything. My personal opinion, which this review discusses, is that the gaze and its results aren’t exactly positive trends for women (as our current “Me too” culture demonstrates).

          And sure, I am writing from my perspective, which holds Western ideologies. Every film critique or review is a subjective opinion. It’s impossible, not to mention uninteresting, to be a critic and write from an objective perspective.

Recent Articles

  1. The Definitives: Solaris
  2. The Definitives: Singin' in the Rain
  3. Re(focused)views: The Room
  4. The Definitives: The Ice Storm
  5. Re(focused)views: Cat People
  6. The Definitives: The Curse of the Cat People
  7. The Definitives: Cat People
  8. Memory Lane: Flatliners
  9. The Definitives: The Big Heat
  10. The Definitives: Sansho the Bailiff
  11. The Definitives: Ugetsu
  12. The Definitives: They Live
  13. Re(focused)views: The Beguiled